NOBLE MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION MEETINGSAUGUS PUBLIC LIBRARY NOVEMBER 15, 2001 |
Present: Fourteen libraries were represented at the
meeting, one in a non-voting capacity, attendance sheet attached.
1.
CALL TO ORDER /WELCOME - Deborah Abraham.
Deborah called the meeting to order at 10:05. She stated since there was
not a quorum of voting representatives at the meeting any votes that need to be
taken will be done at the December meeting.
Sharon Gilley introduced the assistant director at Wakefield, Nanci
Milone Hill.
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The October Minutes will be
voted on at the December meeting since there is not a quorum.
3.
TREASURER’S REPORT – Thomas Scully. Tom
reported that the budget is 25% expended as of the end of October.
10.
RESULTS OF THE netLIBRARY CATALOG SURVEY – Camilla Glynn. This item was moved up on the agenda due to Camilla having to
leave early. Camilla distributed a
handout with the results from the netLibrary survey. The survey polled reference staff and directors as to whether or
not the netLibrary e-book records were found to be useful in the catalog, and
if so, would they want them in their library scope or in the entire collection
scope. As a result of the survey, the
Electronic Resources Working Group Committee decided to recommend taking the
records out of all the individual scopes, but to leave them in entire
collection scope. The motion was
presented to Executive Board as follows:
“NOBLE will add records for
electronic books licensed under NOBLE,
NMRLS, and state contracts to
the NOBLE database not scoped to any
individual library.”
The
motion was passed at Executive Board.
The Committee will meet again in January and Elizabeth is going to
pursue a virtual scope.
4.
MANAGER’S REPORT – Ronald Gagnon. Ron passed
around the NOBLE Member Directory for updating. Ron reported that he received notification from MBLC of two
grants awarded to NOBLE: $13,386 for Image
Linking Software and Workstation, and $18,735 for Telecommunications Equipment to bring the three Lynn branches
on-line. Two of the branches are
scheduled to be ready by January 1st, and the third shortly after
that due to Verizon delays. Also Ron received
contracts from MBLC for our Telecomm
Grant for $113,608, and for Virtual
Catalog for $105,188.
Ron
stated that on January 16, 2002 there would be a meeting of directors as part
of the process for NOBLE’s strategic plan to gather input from libraries. The Executive Board authorized the hiring of
Marshall Keys to moderate the meeting.
More detailed information will follow.
The Members meeting scheduled for the next day, January 17th,
is cancelled.
An
acquisitions survey has been sent out to assist NOBLE staff in planning the
acquisition module. An Innovative
trainer is scheduled to train NOBLE staff from January 8th-10th. Materials’ booking is also being
researched.
The
part-time cataloger position that was posted last month in NOBLE had no
applicants. The posting was extended to
NMRLS and MBLC.
Ron
reported that Metro Boston Library Network chose epixtech as their new system
vendor. Minuteman and CLAMS are in the
process of looking for new systems.
Members
of the Corporation Meeting Page 2
November
15, 2001
Our
auditor has completed the year-end adjustments and reviewed a draft of the
financial statements with Ron. He will
be forwarding the final financial reports by the end of the week along with the
tax returns for filing.
Elizabeth
Thomsen. Elizabeth reported on training. There have been roundtable sessions for
circulation and college course reserves.
Introductory Millennium Create
Lists sessions are coming up. Some
advanced sessions will be scheduled for January-June. Marilyn Graves held the semi-annual interlibrary loan meeting for
users of the NOBLE ILL Center last week, which Elizabeth also attended. It was held at the Swampscott Public
Library.
Martha
Driscoll. Martha reported she began e-mailing to
directors lists of their staff e-mail accounts for them to review. This will be done on a monthly basis. Three circulation roundtable sessions were
held; two for public libraries, one for college libraries. Topics that were discussed were e-mail
notices, security and password issues.
Starting in January passwords will be changed quarterly. It hasn’t been decided yet how the passwords
will be distributed. Also discussed at
the sessions was the book group request issue that is being recommended by the
Holds Committee. Some procedural issues
came up, but overall the feedback was fine with the recommendation. Martha reported on the Local Tech Meeting on November 1st. George Lally did a presentation on Windows
2000 maintenance and security. They
reminded everyone that Windows 95 will no longer be supported by Microsoft at
the end of this year. Browsers, the new
public browser, and multilingual support were also discussed.
5.
HOLDS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION – Thomas Cesarz. Tom was not able to attend the meeting, Deborah Abraham read the
Committee’s two recommendations:
1)
Member
libraries often utilize “display status” in order to exclude items from paging
lists. We recommend that the maximum
time period for an item to be “on display” is three months.
2)
The
standard way to request multiple copies of a title for a reading group is to
send an email message requesting copies of the title. While this is quick it circumvents the holds process. We recommend that requests for reading group
titles utilize the holds process by placing multiple holds for any title that
is needed.
The
recommendations were presented to Executive Board and were approved. This will be discussed at next month’s
Members meeting, as there is not a quorum to vote today and it was tabled from
the October meeting for further discussion.
6.
COLLECTION MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW – Elizabeth Thomsen. Elizabeth passed around handouts and reviewed three components of
collection management.
Collection Maintenance – This involves maintaining
items in your library by following up on long overdues, marking items
“missing”, and maintaining inventory.
Elizabeth reviewed a handout that showed a report created using
Reportster for missing books. She
explained that it creates links to search the catalog and links to Amazon to
search for the title if a library wants to see if the title is still
available. Elizabeth also explained
that you could also run reports that list the barcode. To do this the library would have to
purchase the barcode font, the cost is $31.
Elizabeth also reported that libraries have been using the inventory
scanner device, alternative ways of using it are being looked into. Policies and procedures are also being
worked on. She reiterated that
collection maintenance and reports work best if library staff use
Reportster. She sent out information on
how to download Reportster to a PC.
Information is also on the Staff Information System.
Collection Assessment –
The Mass. Board of Library Commissioners requires this area of collection
management. Starting in January, every
library will get printed reports of their collection on a given subject area
monthly. The reports will include three
different sorts within the subject: call #, published year, and circs. Similar reports can be run locally as needed
using Create Lists and Reportster. Also
Members
of the Corporation Page 3
November
15, 2001
looking
into getting children’s non-fiction, reference, serials, and electronic items
into the collection assessment reports -- currently it only looks at adult
non-fiction. The reports will be
archived so libraries can see other libraries’ reports.
Collection Development – Also required by the MBLC,
libraries will develop and share written collection development policies. The policies will reflect the needs of the
community or institution that the library services. NOBLE will develop and maintain a list of special subject
strengths and special collections of member libraries in print and on our Web
site.
7.
DATABASE QUALITY WORKING GROUP – Thomas Scully. Tom reported on the issue of removing long overdue and missing
items from the database. There will be cutoffs as to when items are removed
depending on how long overdue they are. The goal is to not have items in the
catalog that are more than three years overdue. The committee proposes the following steps on removing overdue
and missing items from the database:
1)
Items
that are overdue for more than five years will be removed from the
catalog. Everyone
will be informed of the
date when that will happen. A list can
be provided before that date if
libraries want to check
their shelves for the item.
2)
Items
that are 3-5 years overdue will be removed.
Libraries will be sent a list and given the
opportunity to either find
or delete the item themselves.
3)
After
the first two steps are complete, then annually any item over 3 years old will
be
removed. Libraries will be given a list to look for
the items before they are removed from the
catalog.
Once
the vote is taken at the December Members’ meeting, the process will start
60-90 days later. Elizabeth brought up
two possibilities that libraries can do before the item is removed. They can either just “write it off”and have
it removed, or libraries can have the item removed but leave a bill on the
patron’s record. Tom reiterated the
importance of marking items “missing” when discovered, and also marking patron
records of undeliverable or changed addresses if notices are returned.
8.
PATRON NOTICES VIA E-MAIL – Martha Driscoll.
Martha reported that beginning in December overdue notices are going to
be sent by e-mail to patrons that provide an e-mail address. If an e-mail address is not provided the
system will know to do a print version.
At the Circ roundtables the public libraries felt patrons need to “sign
off” on this service so they know they will be receiving the notice by
e-mail.
For the colleges it wasn’t decided on how they wanted to handle this. Martha suggested they should have patrons
“sign off” also. The e-mail addresses for both public and college patrons will
be purged. NOBLE will handle bounced
e-mail. The e-mail address will be
removed from the patron record and a “P” message will set saying the e-mail
address bounced. A paper copy of that
notice will be sent to the library.
Bills will be excluded from this e-mail process and will be printed and
sent to libraries. Martha mentioned the
system can be used to send a reminder to patrons by e-mail when books are
coming due --this is an option that can be discussed further at a later date.
9.
WEB BROWSER FOR PUBLIC WORKSTATIONS – Martha Driscoll. Martha did an overhead presentation on the Public Web Browser. It runs
in Internet Explorer 5.5 and above. It
was written by staff at the Mayo Clinic and is specifically designed for use in
libraries. There is no charge for the
software. Martha explained it can be
configured how you want, any button or menu can be added or removed. She stated that if a library has a PC that
is used only as a browser than this software might be enough for
security. The possibility is there that
WinU or any other security software may not be needed on browser only PC’s.
Patrons cannot add or remove bookmarks.
She showed some of the features and settings that can be
configured. It has been installed in
four libraries and is going well. There
is information on the Staff Information System.
Members
of the Corporation Page 4
November
15, 2001
11.
OTHER BUSINESS. Deborah Abraham reminded
everyone to mark January 16th as the meeting to discuss NOBLE’s
long-range plan. Marshall Keys will
moderate the meeting. The Members
meeting scheduled for the next day is cancelled.
12.
ADJOURNMENT. The meeting was adjourned at 11:50.
Respectfully
submitted,
Mary
Rose Quinn
Secretary