NOBLE
MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION MEETING
AT NOBLE
PRESENT: Twenty-one libraries were represented at the
meeting, attendance sheet attached.
CALL TO ORDER: Sue
Koronowski called the meeting to order at
APROVAL OF MINUTES:
Ruth Urell made a motion to
approve the Minutes from the November 10th meeting.
Deborah Abraham seconded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously.
TREASURER’S REPORT: Mary Rose Quinn reported that spending is on target. Barbara Lachance made a motion to approve the treasurer’s
report. Nadine Mitchell seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
MANAGERS’ REPORT:
Ron Gagnon –
·
Reported a
transformer outside our office blew late yesterday afternoon. Our backup UPS stayed on for two hours. Power was restored around
·
Our new ISP, UMass,
is in place as well as a new system server installed. The remaining infrastructure that will be
addressed is upgrading our web and mail servers.
·
Filed our Form
470 for second round of E-Rate funding.
Ron was contacted by a vendor for our cell phone service, but cost was not
better. Also contacted by a vendor for
our data lines, but never received a proposal.
Reimbursements are now discounted off our bills.
·
Ron and Elizabeth
continue to participate in Library Leadership Massachusetts group, initiated at
last summer’s Institute. They attended a
meeting in
·
Ron and Elizabeth
attended Ways and Means Day at the State House.
Ron is on the MLA Legislative Committee and prepared the mailings for Legislative
Day in early April, as well as participated in interviews for a library
lobbyist. MLA is seeking Networks and
Regions to become Partner Members, NOBLE joined as a Partner Member.
·
Several libraries
have expressed interest in having wireless connections. Ron is getting a proposal from Atrion to
provide to libraries. Initial cost is
under $10,000, with the Bluesocket security device being a sizable part of the
costs, but necessary to protect the network.
On-going costs under $2,000.
·
NOBLE staff
hosted Welcome sessions for new directors, Roger Brisson and Brian
Courtemanche, at
·
Ron and ILL
Librarian, Marilyn Graves, are on NMRLS Delivery Committee and attended a
meeting last week at the sort site.
·
PLA National
Conference will be held March 21-25, at
·
·
Ron and Elizabeth
will attend Innovative Users’ Group Meeting in May. Innovative is also planning a Consortia
Meeting in the fall.
·
Network
Administrators met twice since last Members meeting in November. Martha attended the meeting at CW/MARS and
talked about wireless with Bluesocket, since NOBLE received an MBLC grant
subsidy for initial units as a pilot project.
·
NOBLE is
participating in the
·
Our presentation
equipment has been upgraded. In the
Meeting Room a new ceiling-mounted projector and sound system were
installed. In the Training Room our
existing projector was ceiling mounted and a new screen was installed. ADTECH
Systems did the work. The work had been
approved by Executive Board, with funding from capital account.
Members of the Corporation
Meeting Page
2
Elizabeth Thomsen –
·
Reported on the
meeting Keeping It All Together: Media
Parts and Pieces. Aspects of
circulation, tech services, and holds were discussed. Working on improved methods of inputting and
identifying these multi-part items. Some
follow up was done with the Circ Roundtables.
·
Reported on Getting What They Want: Holds, Virtual
Catalog, and ILL Meeting. NOBLE
fills over 286,000 holds each year. A
small percentage may never be filled if left unassisted. The system will keep an item on hold
indefinitely unless some action is taken on that item. Libraries can use Virtual Catalog and
Regional ILL services to get an item sooner if not available in NOBLE catalog. There are over 400 holds in the system from
2000-2004.
Sharon Gilley pointed out
when a patron places a hold from home the system doesn’t automatically page the
item from the library the patron wants to pick it up at.
Gerri Guyote pointed out holds
don’t show pick up location. NOBLE staff
will look into that.
There was a brief
interruption in the meeting due to electric company having to turn off power to
finish work on transformer.
·
Demos were held at
NOBLE on federated search products. Serials
Solutions demonstrated their Central Search product and Innovative demonstrated
MetaFind. Ron, Elizabeth, and Martha are
meeting with IndexData to obtain information on their product.
·
Collection
Management reports are on schedule, will be sortable next week. The Collection Management Team is working on
ways to get default data on the forms.
There is a Collection Management Meeting on April 25th.
·
On March 29th
there is an Imaging Roundtable session.
Martha Driscoll –
·
New Sun Micro
Millennium and training servers were installed in January. The system came up on the original release. Release 2005 is on our training system and
will be implemented once some issues are resolved.
·
Our ISP
changeover to UMass was in January as well.
There were some unexpected issues that caused slowness. Our current router could not handle the traffic;
therefore a new router was purchased. A
TLS circuit was installed, which is a 10MB connection opposed to current 6MB. The new TLS interface was installed in the
central electrical room due to distance issues within the building and has not
been protected with backup power. A
small UPS will be purchased for the device to maintain the Internet connection
during central site power outages.
·
Long overdue items
from 2002 were purged, there were approximately 9,000 items.
·
Sent RFP’s to several
vendors for PC Reservation/Print Management software; Pharos, Comprise Technologies,
Cybrarian and Conway Office Products. Demos will be scheduled in the near
future.
·
Michael Blake
asked Martha about our proxy server. She
explained what it is and how it works.
Roger Brisson asked about
EBSCO records in the database.
Members of the Corporation
Meeting Page
3
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY POLICY REVISION:
Sue Koronowski explained the
policy is presented to the Membership for discussion. Executive Board will review and make
recommendation to the Membership for a vote at a later meeting. Sue has been receiving emails from directors
with suggestions. Many libraries use
NOBLE’s policy as their local policy.
·
Nadine Mitchell
stated that digital surveillance cameras are going to be used beginning in July
at
·
Michael Blake
asked for clarification of the policy that discusses “releasing to
third-party”. He stated when there are
lost items they send the patrons name, and item with title to their Bursar’s
Office for collection. Sue stated once
the item is overdue or lost, then the information can be released.
·
Sharon Gilley had
two points for discussion. The first
being the policy doesn’t govern patron use of computers in the library. Ron explained it depends how libraries keep
track of when patrons use the PC’s. If
they use sign up sheets, then it’s a library issue. If NOBLE has system software that tracks when
patrons use library PC’s, then it’s a NOBLE issue. Also there is only one IP address that goes
to the library for all the PC’s on NOBLE system. Therefore there would be no way of pinpointing
a specific PC if an issue should arise. A question arose regarding when a
patron logs in with patron id card is that information saved on our system or
vendor databases. Martha explained it is
a quick transaction to validate the patron then is gone.
The
second point Sharon brought up is she is not comfortable with the part of
policy that states “no records will be released to law enforcement with a
subpoena or warrant unless attorney is consulted.” Her feeling is if there is a
serious threat or someone in danger she is not comfortable with having to wait
to consult with an attorney.
Lorraine
Jackson stated there have been situations she consulted with attorney about her
decision not to release information.
Ruth
Urell stated
Brian
Courtemanche commented as a private institution they may have a different
perspective or chain of command then a public library as to what action they
need to take. If approached by law
enforcement he would contact administration first.
Linda
Shea stated she can not release any information, whether it’s NOBLE related or
not, without consulting first.
The
general consensus was most libraries will not release information to law
enforcement, with a warrant, without consulting a higher authority or attorney
of their municipality or institution.
Sue
encouraged directors to continue to send emails with comments. The final policy will be presented at next
Members meeting for vote.
Members of the Corporation
Meeting Page
4
February 16, 2006
DELIVERY ISSUES:
Lorraine Jackson commented
that when library staff sends complaints to NMRLS they are forwarding the
message to the delivery company, therefore identifying the person who the
complaint came from. She has asked them
not to forward the message. The
discussion continued.
Some of the issues that
libraries are experiencing are:
·
Items in transit
2-3 weeks and not getting delivered on a timely basis.
·
When deliveries
are made, drivers are not taking pick ups because not enough room in vans. This creates a space problem for libraries
because they are storing anywhere from 6-14 bins waiting to be picked up.
·
No consistent or
regular deliveries. Libraries won’t get
any deliveries one day then get many bins with items from previous weeks.
·
When bins are
picked up they are brought back to the warehouse for sorting. Would be more efficient if sorting can be
done at time of pick up, therefore items could be delivered while on route.
As a result of these issues, not
only is resource sharing being affected, but patrons as well. In some cases if the item is at a nearby
library, staff is telling patrons if they don’t want to wait they will get the
item quicker if they go to the library themselves. This ultimately is doing a disservice to the
patron.
Ron passed around a handout
with a chart showing NOBLE Items in Transit since last August. The trend since mid-January has been on a
steady increase.
Barbara Lachance, who is on
NMRLS Executive Board, took notes and vowed to bring these issues to the NMRLS
meeting that afternoon.
ADJOURNMENT: Mary Rose Quinn made a motion to adjourn. Michael Blake seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at 12:30.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary Pro Tem