NOBLE
MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATION MEETING
AT NOBLE
PRESENT: Seventeen libraries were represented at the meeting, attendance
sheet attached.
CALL TO ORDER: Sue Koronowski called the meeting to order at
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Glenn Macnutt made a motion to
approve Minutes from November 16th meeting. Mary Rose Quinn seconded the
motion, which passed by unanimous vote.
TREASURER’S REPORT: Mary Rose Quinn reported 59% of the budget is expended
as of
MANAGERS’ REPORT:
Ron Gagnon –
·
The building we
lease our office space has been sold.
The new landlord, Brookwood, is out of
·
Ron and Elizabeth
attended Mid-Winter ALA in January. They
met with representatives from Serials Solutions, TDnet,
EBSCO and Overdrive to discuss their downloadable audiobooks. On March 28th, 10-1, there will be
a vendor demonstration on downloadable audio and videos. netLibrary will be demonstrating two
products; Recorded Books and MyLibrary DV.
Overdrive will be demonstrating their products.
Also
at
Ron,
Greg Pronevitz, Michael Colford, and others toured two automated sorting
facilities in Seattle area; one at the Seattle Public Library and the other at King
County Library System. Regions are
currently seeking funding to establish automated sorting sites, but details and
other logistical issues still need to be worked out. A change that libraries need to be aware of
is having to affix barcode labels on the outside of library materials. The state will be looking to standardize the
sorting for this project.
·
Signed contract
with NMRLS to host their web site and email.
Martha is working on setting that up.
·
Strategic Plan
meeting was held in January. Executive
Board reviewed Margo Crist’ report and Elisabeth Tully’s notes. The Board asked Ron to begin writing a first
draft to review at their next meeting.
·
EBSCO and Federated
Search contracts expire June 30th.
Working with Electronic Resources and Database Working Group to get
their input for contract negotiations. Unanimous
decision to stay with EBSCO and continue with the same existing package, as
well as explore additional databases. Ron and Elizabeth are meeting with EBSCO
next week to review proposal. Ron and
Elizabeth meeting with Serials Solutions representative today to get additional
information to review with ERDWG.
·
June Members
meeting has been changed to June 14th due to conflict with ALA. Executive Board will meet a week earlier.
·
New Toshiba digital
copier was purchased for cost of $4,200 under state contract pricing. This will
save $1,000 in maintenance costs per year.
·
Ron attended the
URSA Users Group meeting in
Members of the Corporation
Meeting Page
2
existing software is running. The State is advertising for a vendor to manage
the virtual catalog,
U Mass contract is expiring.
·
E-rate has been
filed, received confirmation, but not approval yet. Staying with current frame relay T-1 and T-3
technology with Verizon. Expecting
approximately $60,000.
·
Advertising new
part-time PC Technician position. This
will support the PC Support program and will be funded through the
program. The position will be one day a
week, $20/hour.
Elizabeth Thomsen –
·
Had two selection sessions by the Collection Management Team. Academic session was facilitated by Myron Schirer-Suter
of Gordon and Betty Dole of SSC. Issues
discussed format migration, selection methods, budget allocations,
accreditation issues. Public session was
facilitated by Linda Walsh of
·
Reported on upcoming meetings: two Circulation
Roundtables April 10th and 11th.
·
Continues to work with steering committee on Digital Commonwealth
Project. Expect to launch a web site in
June. In October there will be a one day
conference, “Digital Day”, at Holy Cross focused on the digital library. There will be two keynote sessions, one by
Marshall Keyes and one by Mary Minnow. More
information will follow.
·
NOBLE Tech Expo will be Tuesday, June 5th. Schedule will be streamlined with formal
presentations in the meeting room. In
the past there were simultaneous sessions going on and attendees had to choose
which one to attend. Reviewed
preliminary schedule.
·
Martha Driscoll –
·
Setting up the new server, Dell Poweredge 6850, 8 GB RAM. It will house all our web sites, email, and
the digital library. Getting NMRLS up
first, then move over all the NOBLE web sites and email.
·
Michele is working on the program to set up with new receipt printer that
can print delivery slips from Millennium.
Thermal printer capable of printing graphics is required. Ron stated it will be shown at the Circ
Roundtables and a group purchase will be done after the meetings. Brief
discussion ensued.
·
Long overdue purge was done in January for items overdue since 2003.
·
Innovative loaded a patch to fix some bug issues.
·
LPT1 has been installed at some libraries, but not set up for staff or public
use yet. There have been problems with
Gates PC’s and wireless PC’s, as well as software installation problems. Martha has been working with George on
resolving these issues.
Lorraine
Jackson, director of Salem Public Library, reported their library was down for four
days. For the record she reported she
was very dissatisfied with Verizon’s lack of service, difficulty to deal with
and incompetence. At one point they
closed the ticket saying the library was up and they weren’t. The technicians were working on lines that
weren’t theirs.
Members
of the Corporation Meeting Page
3
VOTE TO ELECT ASSISTANT
TREASURER:
Ron
reported our By-Laws have the option for an assistant treasurer. A policy was established last year for cases
when an officer is separated from a library or a library is separated from NOBLE,
the officer can not hold their position.
Pending the
APPROVAL OF RESOURCE SHARING
POLICIES:
·
Rescind Reading
Group/Multiple Request Policy -
Ron reported there are two
items recommended from the Resource Sharing Working Group regarding handling
multiple copy requests. The first is
rescinding the Reading Group/Multiple Request Policy language in the Resource
Sharing Policy, and the second part is adding the following language to end of
Network Transfer Policy for a method for special requests:
“For special request, such as
multiple copies, displays, book groups, community reads
and course reserves, libraries
will use the Special Requests Guidelines on the Staff
Information System.”
The
issue arose because libraries don’t know if the request is for a patron, a book
group, display, or
town read. To resolve this issue the Resource Sharing
Working Group and NOBLE came up with a web form for libraries to email to libraries
to request multiple copies and specify the reason. Libraries will know why and can decide if they
want to lend. Sue added it could be a
positive, because a library that has several copies of a book another library requests
for a book group may be more willing to send knowing what it is for.
Ruth Urell spoke against the policy stating that it
will create extra steps, and does not want to get involved in evaluating why a
patron is requesting multiple copies.
She questioned how it will simplify the process. She stated libraries always had the choice to
lend multiple copies or not and feels instituting a policy that is reactionary
is questionable.
Deborah Abraham explained it’s to address making the
process easier between library’s special requests. Barbara Lachance added it is meant to be open
ended giving the library a chance to be specific on their request and the
lending library to make an informed decision.
Ruth stated the new language makes references to
using “Special Requests Guidelines” and without knowing what the guidelines are
does not recommend a vote.
Martha displayed the email web form from the Staff
Information System on the overhead. She
reviewed the form and explained it is for staff use. The form is emailed to all libraries. Susan Conner commented since the form is sent
to all libraries it puts more work on library to see if they own the item. She asked if a clickable link can put on form
for libraries to check.
Brian asked is there middle ground - if just having
the number of copies and how long the library needs it for be sufficient. Ruth asked what prompted all this.
Sue suggested the policy go back to Executive Board
and possibly Resource Sharing Working Group.
Members
of the Corporation Meeting Page
4
·
Add Claims Returned Policy
-
Sue explained the Resource Sharing Working Group developed
a Claims Returned policy that was recommended to Executive Board and approved
at their February 7th meeting.
The policy reads as follows:
Only the library that owns the item can
change its status to claims returned.
Libraries
who are informed by patrons that another
library’s item was returned should follow the
procedure outlined on the Staff
Information System for claims returned items.
Discussion
ensued. A unanimous decision could not
be made; therefore Sue suggested voting on the first sentence and revisit the 2nd
sentence and the suggested procedure.
Ruth Urell made a motion to approve the 1st sentence of the
Claims Returned policy and have Resource Sharing revisit the 2nd
sentence and the suggested procedure. Mary
Rose Quinn second the motion, which passed by unanimous vote.
DIRECTORS’ OVERVIEW: “GET
THEM WHAT THEY WANT”
Due
to time constraints, this item was tabled to next meeting.
NOBLE DIGITAL LIBRARY AND
GRANT MEETING:
Ron
reported that Ruth identified some local grants that would help libraries with their
digital collections. NOBLE would assist, but need to know what
libraries have, etc. Ron is asking for
information from libraries to research the local grants on their behalf. If interested give detail info on SIS.
WORKING GROUP UPDATE:
Covered
in previous agenda items.
Mary
Rose Quinn gave an update on
ADJOURNMENT:
Deborah
Abraham made a motion to adjourn. Barbara
Lachance seconded the motion. The
meeting adjourned at
Respectfully
submitted,